-
October 30th, 2009 13:51 #1
Member
- Join Date
- September 10th, 2009
- Location
- The Americas
- Posts
- 212
Who are the British? personal identity
As an American where "white" is about as specific as anyone gets with regards to heritage, I've always wondered how the British view themselves, and how distinct the ethnic differences are in that country. In other words, how great is the extent to which the English proper look down upon the Welsh, Scottish, and Irish (in order of disgust)? Would an Englishman's family feel akward eating dinner with a Welshman or Scot? Also, do the English themselves really feel an attachment to their partial Germanic heritage, or is there a benevolence towards the Celtic influence which gave them the very name British? I apologize if these are current heated issues, or maybe they're antiquated problems that have long passed?
-
November 2nd, 2009 12:55 #2
As a Brit I dont have any issues with scots, irish or welshman and certainly would never feel disgust at any of them. I know some great people from all these areas, its an outdated view that we do not get on. Britain is now very multi cultural, and i think as a society we have to all make an effort to be respectfull of everyones backgrounds and views. Of course being British is something to be proud of, but not at the expense of being rude to others
-
November 3rd, 2009 07:35 #3
We are a little annoyed at the moment being governed by Scots and by Scots MPs who can vote on English issues whereas their own parliament decide such matters North of the border. These things are political niggles and there is no ethnic difference.
Now if you include the French in the mix.
"A man should look as though he has chosen his clothes with intelligence, put them on with care and then forgotten all about them." Hardy Amies
-
November 3rd, 2009 13:31 #4
Advanced Member
- Join Date
- August 31st, 2005
- Location
- Hawke's Bay, New Zealand.
- Posts
- 2,134
An interest point, I think, is that English often think of themselves as British whereas the Scots and Welsh think of themselves as Scots and Welsh. Maybe for the English this is a hangover of the Empire mentality which tended to be very culturally inclusive. Countries in the far corners of the Empire were still well respected not least because they were seen as exotic and were the source of great wealth for many people.
-
November 3rd, 2009 13:53 #5
In DC, the South, and perhaps the Pacific Northwest, most White Americans are of a plain vanilla persuasion of Scot/English or German.
In Chicago/NY/Philly/Baltimore corridor there are still very distinct cultural identities in the Italian/Greek/Polish and Irish communities.
While it's never come to blows, I often have to watch my language around Italians!!Foppery is a right, not a privilege.
-
November 3rd, 2009 18:45 #6
Member
- Join Date
- September 10th, 2009
- Location
- The Americas
- Posts
- 212
Interesting, haha. I'm from the Northwest and I've never been to that East Coast corridor so I guess I've never seen Italian or Irish communities. That's interesting that you say "Scot/English" and don't include Irish... I was looking through my family tree and saw plenty of Scottish, English, and Welsh names but no Irish. I guess I always assumed they had mixed in with most Americans long ago, but I guess not in my situation.
I brought this topic up because I remember seeing one of those "Just for laughs" prank shows and an old Englishman being pestered by the actor kept asking her "are you Scot? I say, are you a Scot?" as if to imply only a Scot would be irritating. It just made me wonder, are there some old country clubs in New England where I'd get some glances if my last name was 'McNelly' or something?
-
November 5th, 2009 15:27 #7
I always imagined that most Americans were quite keen on their heritage. I've encountered serveral Americans who have proudly explained their families journey to the US from the "old country", often several hundred years of history tripped off their tongues.
In the UK levels of nationalism and any associated ill feeling vary as much as they must do in all countries (DougNZ, no members of a nation ever thinks in exactly the same way about anything). The obvious examples are above: VW Dolly takes an entirely sensible position, whereas culverwood draws up paranoid nationalistic bounderies (unless he has some specific examples).
-
November 6th, 2009 01:31 #8
tribalism made simple
The English
(Flanders & Swan)
The rottenest bits of these islands of ours
We've left in the hands of three unfriendly powers
Examine the Irishman, Welshman or Scot
You'll find he's a stinker as likely as not
The English the English the English are best
I wouldn't give tuppence for all of the rest
The Scotsman is mean as we're all well aware
He's boney and blotchy and covered with hair
He eats salty porridge, he works all the day
And hasn't got bishops to show him the way
The English the English the English are best
I wouldn't give tuppence for all of the rest
The Irishman now our contempt is beneath
He sleeps in his boots and he lies through his teeth
He blows up policemen or so I have heard
And blames it on Cromwell and William the Third
The English are moral the English are good
And clever and modest and misunderstood
The Welshman's dishonest, he cheats when he can
He's little and dark more like monkey than man
He works underground with a lamp on his hat
And sings far too loud, far too often and flat
The English the English the English are best
I wouldn't give tuppence for all of the rest
And crossing the channel one cannot say much
For the French or the Spanish, the Danish or Dutch
The Germans are German, the Russians are red
And the Greeks and Italians eat garlic in bed
The English are noble, the English are nice
And worth any other at double the price
And all the world over each nation's the same
They've simply no notion of playing the game
They argue with umpires, they cheer when they've won
And they practice before hand which ruins the fun
The English the English the English are best
I wouldn't give tuppence for all of the rest
It's not that they're wicked or naturally bad
It's just that they're foreign that makes them so mad
The English are all that a nation should be
And the pride of the English are Donald and me
The English the English the English are best
I wouldn't give tuppence for all of the rest
-
November 6th, 2009 11:16 #9
Senior Member
- Join Date
- December 23rd, 2007
- Location
- london,england
- Posts
- 669
This is in the style and spirit of Flanders and Swann :-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kL1zs...E3BD1&index=14
Though these days you would probably be prosecuted for singing it.
-
November 6th, 2009 12:37 #10
Member
- Join Date
- September 10th, 2009
- Location
- The Americas
- Posts
- 212
It's impossible to find historical racial information anymore these days because it's not 'politically correct', but I thought I remembered reading somewhere that the English, even the royalty, are not an entirely Germanic people but significantly interfused with the original Celtic inhabitants of the Isles. Though actually I'm not sure I even buy the argument that there are distinct 'races' in Northern Europe- the mere fact that say Wales happens to have a larger number of short dark-complexion people and the Danelaw has a higher number of blondes doesn't mean those characteristics are exclusivly origined in those peoples. In other words, a tall blonde Welshman could be 100% Welsh since antiquity and a short black-eyed Swede could be pure Swedish.
It's interesting though that those songs didn't make fun of the Danes or Scandinavians... do the Englishman still feel a connection to Denmark? i.e. through the Angles and Jutes? I thought Shakespeare's choice for Hamlet's country had something to do with that....
-
November 11th, 2009 06:23 #11
Member
- Join Date
- October 15th, 2008
- Location
- Cambridge, UK
- Posts
- 250
I think it's true to say that genetically we are both the native inhabitants of the land and the later invaders too.
I did read somewhere that the Welsh are genetically 'purer' than the rest of the UK i.e. there has been less intermingling with invaders due to the security of their mountain fastnesses. The English and Scots were well infiltrated; much northern vernacular has Scandinavian roots -- Fell (Fjellet) for a hill, Dale (Dalen) for a valley etc -- and Old Norse was still being spoken in the Islands a century or so ago.
Historically English nationalism has been lower profile than Welsh or Scottish though it is more visible today. Perhaps because England was the dominant partner for so long but is now faced by the might of the EU? Nationalism/patriotism is a funny mix of pride and an inferiority complex a lot of the time -- I've always thought it rather un-English.
-
November 11th, 2009 07:25 #12
The Flanders & Swann song is, of course, tongue in cheek.
"Donald Swann was born in Llanelli, Wales. His father was a Russian doctor of English descent, from the expatriate community that started out as the Muscovy Company, and his mother was a nurse from Transcaspia — they were refugees from the Russian Revolution. "
Recent research, based on the DNA of a caveman's remains found in Cheddar Gorge, found that over 90% of the population had DNA that was linked to his remains, one "very close" match, and 2 exact matches.
If there is any hostility between English, Welsh, Scots and Irish, it tends to be from the Welsh, Scots and Irish towards the English, rather than the other way round. They almost invariably will support any team that England is playing, rather than England. Most English people that I know will support any British team against a truly foreign one.
-
November 14th, 2009 05:16 #13
New Member
- Join Date
- August 1st, 2009
- Location
- Birmingham, UK
- Posts
- 78
I wouldn't say there was real hostility from the English to Scots/Welsh/Irish, though there is some ignorance. I still see English people frequently confusing British with English and including Scots/Welsh especially as English rather than recognising their own national identities, or even Britishness.
There is some hostility from Scots to English, though its mostly either political or - relatively - good natured 'glad we're not like those English'. Mostly its historical & exhibited most frequently in football & humour rather than anything serious.
I'd agree with DougNZ's point "that English often think of themselves as British whereas the Scots and Welsh think of themselves as Scots and Welsh." Its a generalisation of course, but one I recognise.
As a Scot I identify myself as Scottish and see Britishness as purely a political construct, used most often by the English, rather than an actual national identity - for me at any rate others will feel differently.
-
November 16th, 2009 00:45 #14
as a UK immigrant, i refer to myself as British because i am neither an ethnic scot, welshman nor englishman. most of my english friends choose based on circumstances - abroad they identify themselves as british but among britons they say english. it makes sense, rather.
-
November 16th, 2009 08:49 #15
Super Member
- Join Date
- March 11th, 2007
- Location
- Buxton, England
- Posts
- 1,459
As a people group the English in general do not know nor are they generally interested in their ethnic identity. Education does not deal with it - probably the PC agenda.
Two large studies have shown two different outcomes:
Brian Sykes ( Oxford Uni) genetic research has shown that whilst there is a strong north german element to the English its only about 30% and strongest in the north, midlands and east.
Bangor University (Wales) genetic research showed that 80-100% of native English men are descended on their father's side from north germans or vikings.
Go figure!
I strongly suspect that the outcome is affected by what the researchers wanted to find in the first place. The findings certainly reflect the researchers' political views.
All research agrees that in the far south of England you find a very high celtic make up - but only one study I've read realises the obvious point that there were huge deportations to the colonies from the South East which was repopulated as a deliberate act of industrialsts and commercial types by Welsh people - so you find a high number of people with Welsh ancestory in the SE of England - much more than anywhere else.
-
November 17th, 2009 03:01 #16
All research agrees that in the far south of England you find a very high celtic make up - but only one study I've read realises the obvious point that there were huge deportations to the colonies from the South East which was repopulated as a deliberate act of industrialsts and commercial types by Welsh people - so you find a high number of people with Welsh ancestory in the SE of England - much more than anywhere else.[/quote]
As a Historian I'd be very interested to hear what this "All research" is. I've certainly never been aware of "huge deportations to the colonies from the South East ", neither am I aware of the South East being "repopulated as a deliberate act of industrialsts and commercial types by Welsh people".
-
November 17th, 2009 10:55 #17
Super Member
- Join Date
- March 11th, 2007
- Location
- Buxton, England
- Posts
- 1,459
As a Historian I'd be very interested to hear what this "All research" is. I've certainly never been aware of "huge deportations to the colonies from the South East ", neither am I aware of the South East being "repopulated as a deliberate act of industrialsts and commercial types by Welsh people".[/quote]
You will have to do your own research as I did. Read the myriad of books and on line articles - chose the scholarly ones not the more whimsical ones.
-
November 17th, 2009 16:33 #18
Sounds like poppycock to me. There was mass migration from the British Isles in the 18th and 19th centuries, including significant numbers of people heading to N America and Australasia from Ireland and the west of Scotland as a result of famine and land clearance but the notion that the South East of England was some sort of underpopulated wasteland, made ready for roaming Welsh settlers to inhabit, is patent nonsense.
-
November 18th, 2009 05:40 #19
Member
- Join Date
- October 15th, 2008
- Location
- Cambridge, UK
- Posts
- 250
-
November 18th, 2009 21:21 #20
To return to the OP's question I'd say that the key thing to note is that for such a geographically small country the British Isles are hugely varied in terms of population and people's perception of their own identity is often not dependant on any rational analysis.
For example and as others have stated, if you ask somebody from Wales if they're Welsh or British then they'll typically say that they're Welsh, but if you ask the same person to tell you where they're from then they may be considerably more location specific. People from Swansea, for example, would hate anyone to think that they were from Cardiff and vice versa.
Similar distinctions exist between other cities with long histories of rivalry, witness the antipathy between people from Liverpool and Manchester, Newcastle and Sunderland, Nottingham and Derby, Ipswich and Norwich, Glasgow and Edinburgh and so on.
This sort of regional pride isn't confined to big cities as demonstrated on a smaller scale by events such as Ashbourne's Royal Shrovetide Football Match, which divides villagers based on which side of the local river they live. In numerous parts of the country such bitter rivalries have festered over hundreds of years, all of which adds to the rich tapestry of life in Britain.
To add further to the complexity there are historical county or regional rivalries, for example the Roses counties of Lancashire and Yorkshire have no great love for each other and northerners and southerners, in England at least, may not always see eye to eye.
In essence the people of the British Isles seem determined to find ways to assert their local / city / county / regional / national / international identity whenever the mood or situation demands. This type of antagonistic behaviour typically works best if a suitable opposite number can be found. Thus someone from Cardiff may not think much of people from Swansea but they'll both happily dislike the English until somebody questions their 'Britishness' in which case we'll all hate the Germans.
On a day to day basis we really do all get on and although there is some (mostly) light-hearted banter I'd say that the whole 'them and us' or 'us against the world' mentality isn't always such a bad thing. It's just a bit of a potential minefield for the uninitiated.
Just my thoughts,
Peter
-
November 19th, 2009 08:37 #21
^Don't forget Kentish men and Men of Kent
-
November 19th, 2009 13:50 #22
It should have been top of my list, given the number of years I lived in Canterbury.
-
November 23rd, 2009 12:33 #23
New Member
- Join Date
- August 1st, 2009
- Location
- Birmingham, UK
- Posts
- 78
It is perfectly possible for both studies to be perfectly accurate & scientifically unbiased. Its just a matter of which gene or set of genes (used as identifiers of a certain historical or current ethnic/regional group) are studied & looked for by the researchers. Unless both sets of genes are mutually exclusive, which I believe is unlikely given the mixing of genes over that number of generations, you can easily get a situation where the sample population has both genes showing they're descended from Vikings/North Germans (have X gene) & not descended from Vikings/North Germans (don't have Y gene) (where both X & Y genes would have been present in the original Viking population). For a better explanation of this read 'Eve's Tale' from 'The Ancestor's Tale' by Richard Dawkins.
-
November 24th, 2009 03:12 #24
You will have to do your own research as I did. Read the myriad of books and on line articles - chose the scholarly ones not the more whimsical ones.[/quote]
What a cop out!
In other words, I can't support my assertion with evidence, so I'll avoid the argument by assuming some kind of moral superiority. It won't wash I'm afraid! You made the assertion, you need to support it!
-
November 25th, 2009 13:43 #25
Member
- Join Date
- September 10th, 2009
- Location
- The Americas
- Posts
- 212
Haha! In my personal opinion, there can never be too much contempt for the Krauts.
Servile automatons they are.
That's a bit unsettling from a previous post that the majority Welsh would support the foreign team rather than England in a football match. Do others agree that's actually what would happen? That would be a fairly substantial schism of identity if true.
Similar Threads
-
Sock Brand Identity
By yachtie in forum Andy's Fashion ForumReplies: 7Last Post: January 11th, 2010, 20:32 -
A side-benefit of dressing well... Mistaken Identity!
By Grayson in forum Andy's Fashion ForumReplies: 32Last Post: May 30th, 2008, 09:09 -
Mistaken identity
By bulla in forum Andy's Fashion ForumReplies: 3Last Post: May 9th, 2007, 21:42 -
Revealing your identity?
By Intrepid in forum The InterchangeReplies: 0Last Post: October 30th, 2005, 04:57 -
Help re: identity of clothier
By seacliff in forum Andy's Fashion ForumReplies: 0Last Post: May 14th, 2005, 12:53



Reply With Quote
