The implicit assumption of this post, being that homosexuality is a negative and something to be avoided, is distasteful.
The assertion elsewhere that pink is 'for little girls' is also offensive.
I presume that members appreciate that many of their esteemed associates on this forum will enjoy a multitudinous range of sexual preferances?
I am not kidding, allow me to assure you. Further and in respect of your reference to the pre 1972 edition of the DSM, such outmoded and ludicrous beliefs are no longer granted scientific status and thus not to be found in modern editions. (A lot of other fallacious nonsense is contained within the latest edition, but that is another matter entirely). Characterising a sexual act in such a base manner is simply facile and can equally be applied to heterosexual intercourse; 'rooting around in the vagina'.You've got to be kidding. I'll go back to the pre-1972 DSM.
Yes, my son rooting around the lower intestine of another man is perfectly natural?????? I have some negative attitudes about that.
I consider that you have taken this argument beyond the already dubious territory from which it commenced and are fast approaching an area which I trust will not be tolerated by the moderators. A passionate debate is one thing, unsubstantiated and hateful commentary quite another.