I hope we can all agree that Bigots are distasteful in whatever form they may appear and wherever they may be found! Should any of you gentlemen wish to argue the point, do so through PM. Otherwise, move on.
In a few countries speaking out for homosexuality is acceptable and in those countries if you speak out against it you're considered a freak or simply in the wrong.
I do however object when that conversation turns to one of prejudice, antipathy and contempt. Further, when humour is used as subterfuge to convey same prejudice, antipathy and contempt, it is just as bad.
In general, agreed. However reducing or equating homosexuality to anal sex is homophobic.
Sex acts are wide and varied, and don't require one to be either heterosexual or homosexual. I would put forth that sexual orientation is based on sexual attraction: is one drawn to men, women, both, or none?What else differentiates a homosexual from a heterosexual apart from the form of sex act?
Or in some politically correct tyrannies in Europe you get prosecuted.
Sweden ? Sermon lands you in jail https://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,147084,00.html
Loony Britain? Firemen get prosecuted and fined for interrupting gays who are at it in a public park
elderly couple get targetted by vindictive gay busybodies who insist on staying in a double bed at their Christian B&B
Only Russia left - gay mischief maker Peter Tatchell got what Tony Hancock used to call 'a punch up the bracket' when he tried to start stirring things up over there. Bet he would not chance it in Iran or Uganda.
'Anarcho tyranny' Real crime goes unpunished while new Thought Crimes are invented to punish the law abiding majority.
Sex acts are wide and varied, and don't require one to be either heterosexual or homosexual. I would put forth that sexual orientation is based on sexual attraction: is one drawn to men, women, both, or none?