An odd item I picked up thrifting yesterday: A pair of nice-looking shoes, hardly worn, made of waxy black leather with some fine brogueing on them. The look is more European and delicate, and they are completely lined inside with soft tan leather. They have ubber heels and the front of the outsole is also rubber. It is very comfortable and fits me nicely.
Here is the odd part: These shoes have a cloth label on each insole witha Brioni logo which is obviously not the standard Brioni logo. Underneath the logo it says AB Group of Professionals, with a website on the internet added. So it is clearly a knockoff. At $8, but it was worth a try to see how well the shoes would hold up, so I picked them up. A bit of searching turned up several references to an outfit called Brioni at Bangkok, which is a tailoring establishment in that city.
I found an exact example of the label on the web, although it is on a shirt, and not on shoes:
Is it legal to use a famous company's name in this fashion? Why hasn't the real Brioni company taken any action against these tailors? They seem to be still in business.
Here is the odd part: These shoes have a cloth label on each insole witha Brioni logo which is obviously not the standard Brioni logo. Underneath the logo it says AB Group of Professionals, with a website on the internet added. So it is clearly a knockoff. At $8, but it was worth a try to see how well the shoes would hold up, so I picked them up. A bit of searching turned up several references to an outfit called Brioni at Bangkok, which is a tailoring establishment in that city.
I found an exact example of the label on the web, although it is on a shirt, and not on shoes:
Is it legal to use a famous company's name in this fashion? Why hasn't the real Brioni company taken any action against these tailors? They seem to be still in business.
Last edited: